Skip to content

9 Instances Celebrities And Companies Battled In Courtroom

Movie star authorized battles are as outdated because the movie and music industries. From the scandal that disgraced silent movie star Fatty Arbuckle to the Depp V. Heard battle of 2022, stars have been going to courtroom with excessive priced attorneys at their sides to battle issues out. Typically it is over legal costs, typically it is for libel or breach of contract, and different instances stars are sticking it to huge enterprise.


Associated: These Are The ten Dumbest Hollywood Lawsuits To Date

One could be shocked to study which stars have sued which corporations. Tom Waits sued a potato chip empire. Bette Midler sued a automotive firm. Lindsey Lohan sued a online game! The listing might go on and on, however for the sake of time and house let’s simply speak about 9 of probably the most spectacular superstar v. company circumstances.

THETHINGS VIDEO OF THE DAY

9/9 George Clooney And Julia Roberts Vs. Digital Projection Inc.

Julia Roberts and her frequent co-star George Clooney took the projector firm Digital Manufacturing Inc. and its audio companion, Past Audio Inc., to courtroom for unauthorized use of their pictures. The businesses used the identify and pictures of each stars to maneuver gross sales for his or her movie projectors and leisure programs. The lawsuit claimed that the businesses violated the protected use of Clooney and Roberts’ emblems and their proper to privateness.

THETHINGS VIDEO OF THE DAY

8/9 Lindsey Lohan vs. GTA / RockStar Video games

Allegedly, a personality within the Grand Theft Auto universe named Lacey Jonas was impressed by Lohan, who fairly famously had a public picture that was making headlines for erratic and harmful conduct. In keeping with Lohan’s go well with, the character copied Lohan’s picture, garments, and her signature “peace signal pose.” Lohan misplaced this battle and her following enchantment was denied.

7/9 Scarlett Johansson vs. JC Lattes

JC Lattes is a French writer of fiction and different genres. The corporate revealed a novel known as The First Factor We Look At by Gregoire Delacourt in 2015. The e-book is a few automotive mechanic who turns into obsessive about a girl that he’s satisfied is the well-known actress. Johansson sued the writer for utilizing her likeness within the novel with out her consent. The creator replied that her e-book by her was a piece of fiction and that the character was certainly not Scarlett Johansson however one “Jeanine Foucaprez.” Regardless of Johansson’s finest efforts, the French novel was launched in English that very same yr.

6/9 Kim Kardashian Vs Outdated Navy

Kim Okay took the clothes retailer chain Outdated Navy to courtroom for his or her use of a look-a-like in one among their advertisements. The impersonator was one Melissa Molinaro, who Kim argued was too much like her in look and that her presence within the advert would confuse Kim’s followers and trigger individuals to consider she was endorsing the model. The corporate settled with Kim for $20 million.

Associated: 8 Loopy Lawsuits The Kardashians Have Been Concerned In

5/9 Ariana Grande vs. Eternally 21

Like Kim Kardashian, the pop diva and Nickelodeon alum sued the clothes chain for his or her use of a look-a-like mannequin. Eternally 21 additionally used samples of her tune “7 Rings” within the advert with stated look-a-like. Grande had walked away from a merchandise deal earlier than her lawsuit de ella when the corporate couldn’t pay her the suitable share of her market worth, in keeping with courtroom paperwork. The case was put aside when Eternally 21 started chapter proceedings in 2019, however many consider the battle is much from over.

4/9 Rihanna vs. TopShop

After filming in Northern Eire in 2011, UK clothes chain TopShop used pictures of Rihanna from her shoot on t-shirts and merchandise. The R&B star sued TopShop for $5 million because the picture that was bought to them was taken with out her permission from her. This all resulted in a prolonged backwards and forwards with the corporate, however Rihanna would ultimately emerge from the courtroom because the victor in 2015.

3/9 Elon Musk Vs Twitter

In early 2022, the billionaire tech mogul made an impulsive buy when he promised to purchase Twitter. I’ve promised to make it a haven for freedom of speech and that sure banned accounts, like that of ex-president Donald Trump, could be restored. Musk shortly started to backtrack on his promise to buy the corporate, citing every kind of technical points that some would argue ought to have been foreseen.

The corporate’s worth additionally took a little bit of a dive after he already promised to purchase it for $44 billion (round $52 per share). As of October 2022, Musk has since deserted his authorized battle and accepted the phrases he had beforehand agreed to. However Musk, who has a monitor file of backtracking on grandiose guarantees, might nonetheless discover some method to weasel out of the deal. Hey, he is achieved it earlier than…

2/9 Bette Midler vs. Ford

The Broadway legend and star of the Hocus Pocus movies sued Ford Motor Firm and the advert company Younger and Rubicon. The businesses employed a sound-a-like singer for advertisements that used the substitute singer to cowl Midler’s hit cowl of a Bobby Freeman tune. Midler argued that the usage of a sound-a-like infringes on her model of ella and confused followers as a result of the sound between the advert and Midler was just about indistinguishable. Midler received and her case would go on to be cited in one other lawsuit pushed by her good friend, Tom Waits.

Associated: Broadway Star Bette Midler As soon as Had An Affair With Rockstar Tom Waits

1/9 Tom Waits vs. Frito-Lay

Tom Waits is often a cool character, however he isn’t a fan of his music being in commercials. Waits sued Frito-Lay after he refused to permit them to make use of his tune “Step Proper Up,” for an advert. Like Ford tried with Midler, the snack firm employed a sound-a-like to imitate Wait’s distinct raspy sound. Frito-Lay argued in courtroom that Waits was not well-known sufficient to be confused with their singer, and due to this fact his sound was not distinct sufficient to be confused with theirs. The courtroom disagreed and Waits was awarded $2.5 million for the false endorsement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *